Jobs and the New Growth Agenda 72%

By Steve Zehngut34%

12/2/2009, 8:54:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Indoctrination, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.2% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 664 faulty-reasoning hits from 274 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (5,612 of 19,892 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the article peer group.

December 2, 2009 
Michael Lind 
President Obama’s December 3rd jobs summit has drawn attention to the debate over policy options for job creation. 
The case for intelligent and aggressive public policy to promote job creation, in addition to the helpful but inadequate stimulus package, is overwhelming. 
The official unemployment rate is currently 10.2 percent, and rises to 17.5 percent when marginally attached workers and those working part-time out of necessity are included. 
What some call the Great Recession is no ordinary cyclical downturn to be followed in due course by a normal recovery. 
The economic emergency combines the effects of a global financial crisis with the bursting of a decade-old bubble economy driven by asset inflation. 
The recovery period will be protracted and characterized by high unemployment. 
Instead of a temporary program to be repealed pending recovery, what is needed is a sustained economic growth program in which short-term policies are converted into permanent structural reforms as the economy grows stronger. 
An effective program for creating jobs in the short term while laying the groundwork for future growth must meet several tests. 
First, public spending or tax expenditures must have high multiplier effects. 
Second, short-term policies should be of value if they are converted into long-term reforms. 
Finally, the scale should be adequate and substantial, not inadequate and symbolic. 
These tests are met by a new growth agenda with three major elements: 
 Infrastructure Investment 
 Public Service Investment 
 Pro-Growth Tax Reform 
Read the full report here (PDF, 5pp), or click on the icon in the right-hand column. 
Attachments: Jobs and the New Growth Agenda (PDF, 5pp) 
Confirmation Bias
13.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
9.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
8.8%
Framing Effect
16.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
12.4%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
11.7%
Negativity Bias
12.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
1.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
16.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
4.7%
Hasty Generalization
16.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
8.4%
Begging the Question
22.3%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
8.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
7.7%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
41.2%
Indoctrination
20.8%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
5.8%

274 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.