Speaker summary
86%1 analyzed article/video7 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US NATO Amb. results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 7 hits. Analysis detected 14 faulty-reasoning hits from 7 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,198 of 18,558 speakers). This US NATO Amb. is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.