Speaker summary
53%2 analyzed articles/videos9.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UC Berkeley results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 81.3% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 13 faulty-reasoning hits from 9.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 81.3% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,539 of 18,216 speakers). This UC Berkeley is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.