BS Summary: These Stand Up for Science Foundation results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,486 of 16,398 speakers). This Stand Up for Science Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.

Sort byMost recentArticle rank - bestArticle rank - worst

Here’s what happens when you put politicians in charge of science⁠^8%

Science News⁠^18%By Tina Hesman Saey⁠^33%7/10/2026, 3:30:00 PM