Speaker summary
â 90%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These public defender's office results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 86.2% and a BS Rank of â 82% (3,481 of 18,558 speakers). This public defender's office is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.