Speaker summary
62%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Chodas results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,729 of 17,813 speakers). This Paul Chodas is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.