BS Summary: These Paul Cassell results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 85 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of 75% (4,477 of 17,587 speakers). This Paul Cassell is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.