Speaker summary
ā 91%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Northeasternās researchers results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 196 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ā 77% (4,381 of 18,558 speakers). This Northeasternās researchers is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.