Speaker summary
â 81%1 analyzed article/video113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naser results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error and Hasty Generalization, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 56.6% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 177 faulty-reasoning hits from 113 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.2% and a BS Rank of â 70% (5,457 of 18,216 speakers). This Naser is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.