Speaker summary
75%3 analyzed articles/videos233.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mufalo Chitam results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.5% saturation with 122.673 hits. Analysis detected 577.241 faulty-reasoning hits from 233.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of 33% (12,583 of 18,558 speakers). This Mufalo Chitam is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.