Speaker summary
63%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Star Tribune results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of 77% (4,366 of 18,558 speakers). This Minnesota Star Tribune is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.