BS Summary: These Michael Mulvihill results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,764 of 16,838 speakers). This Michael Mulvihill is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.