Speaker summary
â 68%1 analyzed article/video176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juan Rangel results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ad Hominem, and Recency Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 578 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.3% and a BS Rank of â 39% (11,324 of 18,558 speakers). This Juan Rangel is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.