BS Summary: These Journal of Policy Analysis and Management results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 42 faulty-reasoning hits from 14 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,470 of 17,551 speakers). This Journal of Policy Analysis and Management is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.