Speaker summary
75%1 analyzed article/video37.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Gomez Faria results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 94.9% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 142.999 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 92.3% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,383 of 18,428 speakers). This Hannah Gomez Faria is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.