Speaker summary
71%1 analyzed article/video40.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Alfredsson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 40.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52% and a BS Rank of 70% (5,719 of 18,945 speakers). This Daniel Alfredsson is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.