Speaker summary
55%1 analyzed article/video83.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arthur Caplan results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 56.3% saturation with 44.5 hits. Analysis detected 106.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 83.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of 50% (9,311 of 18,610 speakers). This Arthur Caplan is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.