Raw Story94%

WSJ disgusted as Trump economy becomes 'nothing to brag about' 80%

By Matthew Chapman87%

7/30/2026, 5:57:56 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50.8% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 542 faulty-reasoning hits from 246 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.8% and a BS Rank of 80% (4,594 of 22,228 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump got a tongue-lashing from the conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board over the latest dismal economic numbers. 
"The U.S. economy grew a tepid 1.5% during the second quarter, driven by consumers and AI investment," wrote the board. 
Meanwhile, net exports "subtracted a point" from GDP, and government spending was down too  though the board was less concerned about that. 
The economy is "shrugging off" the war in Iran, at least, the board noted  but that's "nothing to brag about." 
The fundamental issue, the board continued, is Trump's ongoing obsession with tariffs, an issue they have slammed him for frequently as dragging his economy down. 
"Mr. 
Trump thinks that, with the stock market hitting records and the economy avoiding recession, his tariffs are working wonders," said the board. 
However, the economy is "underperforming by half" if Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s 3% GDP target is the benchmark. 
"Last year’s tax bill and deregulation would be driving faster growth if not for Mr. 
Trump’s border taxes that raise costs and uncertainty for business." 
Through all of this, the board said, inflation remains persistently high, and the tariffs are contributing to it. 
"Some of Mr. 
Trump’s most ardent fans tell us they wish he’d drop his tariff fixation and return to the supply-side policies that produced broad-based prosperity during his first term," the board lamented. 
For that matter, they added, "most Americans probably do too." 
Confirmation Bias
17.1%
Anchoring Bias
7.3%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
16.7%
Loss Aversion
9.3%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
15.9%
Negativity Bias
50.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
12.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
8.9%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
10.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
4.1%
Appeal to Emotion
8.1%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
16.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
19.5%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
12.2%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

246 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.