Fox News⁠97%

WATCH: Pentagon drops SHOCKING new UFO files ⁠31%

7/11/2026, 10:30:09 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 2.1% saturation with 8 hits. Analysis detected 29 faulty-reasoning hits from 384 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (9,867 of 14,148 videos). This video is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the video peer group.

Hi Charlie. 19 new videos, four audio 
files, plus pictures and more than a 
dozen documents. That's what is in this 
latest release of information from the 
Department of War. It includes this 
military infrared video right here 
capturing an unidentified star-shaped 
object flying over the Yellow Sea, 
according to the department. The 
18-second clip was taken just last year 
and submitted by the US Indo-Pacific 
Command. Another object was reportedly 
spotted closer to home just over the 
Atlantic Ocean back in 2020. The 
Pentagon describes this one as seemingly 
quote traveling with the wind, but says 
it did not maneuver or change direction. 
The department is saying it was about 15 
feet in height and resembled a deformed 
balloon. Now, we're also getting a look 
at objects found decades ago. An initial 
report from an Air Force project in 1948 
detailing 100 UFO sightings the year 
before. The military got a hold of what 
they believed was a boomerang- shaped 
UFO, but there is not much more 
information about it. Plus, take a look 
at this photo coming up right here. In 
1996, astronauts aboard the Space 
Shuttle Columbia snapped a picture of an 
unidentified object in low Earth orbit. 
This is the fourth dump of information 
from the Trump administration within 
roughly the past two months, and the 
chair of a scientific advisory council 
advising the UAP governance board says 
this is all about keeping the public 
informed. 
>> So, it's all about transparency and also 
figuring things out. The hope is 
that either data within the US 
government or new data that we will 
collect in the near future might 
indicate that we have neighbors. 
>> All of this newly declassified 
information is available on the 
Department of War's website, and we do 
expect a fifth batch will be released. 
So, we will let you know when that is, 
and of course, what's in it, Charlie. 
Maybe something about those neighbors. 
>> Yes, indeed. I'm sure you will. It's 
pretty amazing to watch all of these 
videos on the White House and other 
government websites. Uh Natalie, Chuck, 
always appreciate it. 
Be sure to like and subscribe for all 
the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch 
full shows streaming now on Fox 1. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
1.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
1.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
1.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
2.1%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

384 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.