NTD⁠100%

Trump: China's Policy in 2018 Was to 'Make Him(Trump) Resign or Prevent Him Re-election' ⁠97%

7/17/2026, 10:45:09 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 70.1% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 644 faulty-reasoning hits from 134 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 96% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (535 of 17,639 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 97.00% of the video peer group.

TheĀ cover-upĀ ofĀ thisĀ colossalĀ securityĀ breachĀ isĀ evenĀ moreĀ disturbingĀ inĀ lightĀ ofĀ theĀ additionalĀ informationĀ showingĀ thatĀ ChinaĀ engagedĀ inĀ otherĀ election-relatedĀ activitiesĀ toĀ undermineĀ myĀ firstĀ administrationĀ andĀ ourĀ 2020Ā campaign.Ā 
>>Ā [snorts]Ā 
>>Ā TheyĀ didĀ notĀ notĀ wantĀ andĀ theyĀ justĀ didn'tĀ wantĀ it.Ā 
TheyĀ foughtĀ likeĀ hellĀ notĀ toĀ haveĀ itĀ DonaldĀ TrumpĀ toĀ winĀ andĀ forĀ goodĀ reason.Ā 
AsĀ theĀ documentsĀ weĀ areĀ releasingĀ show,Ā 
CIAĀ reportingĀ explicitlyĀ stated,Ā andĀ IĀ quote,Ā 
"InĀ mid-2018,Ā theĀ ChineseĀ CommunistĀ Party'sĀ policyĀ wasĀ toĀ leverageĀ allĀ domesticĀ andĀ foreignĀ elementsĀ thatĀ wereĀ opposedĀ toĀ theĀ USĀ presidentĀ inĀ anĀ effortĀ toĀ reduceĀ theĀ USĀ president'sĀ votesĀ andĀ makeĀ himĀ resignĀ orĀ preventĀ hisĀ re-election."Ā 
Isn'tĀ thatĀ nice?Ā 
Confirmation Bias
30.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
37.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
39.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
70.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
54.5%
Halo Effect
5.2%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
5.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
64.9%
False Dilemma
29.1%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
5.2%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
41%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
47.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
38.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
11.9%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

134 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.