Fans Reflect on Stephen Colbert and The Legacy of ‘The Late Show’ 53%

By Meg Felling0%

5/21/2026, 11:38:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 315 faulty-reasoning hits from 192 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,998 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the article peer group.

Outside the Ed Sullivan Theater in Manhattan, fans shared their thoughts on the legacy of “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” as the late-night program prepares to tape its final episode. 
“I think he’s a genius and he’s going to be totally missed, and I would have really done anything to be here today.” 
“I’m just a big fan of his because I was here for his first show, and now I’m going to be seeing his final show, and it’s an emotional time.” 
“I think we kind of wanted to be in the room where it happened. 
Even though we won’t be in the room, we’re on the street where it happened. 
He’s a very intelligent, well-spoken, well-thought-out person who is able to make the news bearable.” 
“If we can’t laugh about what’s happening, I think we’re all going to just totally lose it. 
So we’ll really, really miss Stephen.” 
“I think as a society we’re taking a big step backwards in terms of being able to tell the truth, and it’s sad. 
It shouldn’t have ended this way.” 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
7.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
15.1%
Status Quo Bias
3.1%
Sunk Cost Effect
15.6%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
20.8%
Negativity Bias
19.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
12%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
19.8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
8.9%
Slippery Slope
8.9%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
12%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
8.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
3.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
8.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

192 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.