NTD100%

Rep. Rosa DeLauro: Judges Face Alarming Rise in Threats!91%

7/14/2026, 10:01:15 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Recency Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 236 faulty-reasoning hits from 107 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,495 of 15,741 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the video peer group.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro: Judges Face Alarming Rise in Threats! 
No one can ignore the disturbing rise in threats directed at members of the federal judiciary. 
It is not lost on me or any of us the increasing prevalence and intensity of threats against not only you and your colleagues on the Supreme Court, but against judges throughout the federal judiciary. 
As of the 1st of July, there have been 370 threats made to federal judges, according to the US Marshals Service. 
During the entirety of last year, there were 564 threats made. 
At this rate, we are looking at a 31% year-over-year increase in threats against federal judges. 
That is simply and deeply an alarming rise. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
13.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
58.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
28.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
30.2%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
13.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
58.6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

116 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.