NTD100%

TikTok Urges Appellate Court to Dismiss New York Case 93%

4/9/2026, 1:00:33 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Primacy Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 57.4% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 529 faulty-reasoning hits from 141 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 89.1% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,203 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the video peer group.

And today in New York, Tik Tok is set to argue before a state appeals court. 
The company seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Attorney General Leticia James. 
In October 2024, James joined a coalition of 14 state attorneys general in filing separate lawsuits against Tik Tok. 
The attorneys general alleged the app uses addictive features that cause high rates of anxiety and depression and that the 
company misrepresents the safety of its platform. 
Tik Tok previously sought to dismiss the New York case, arguing the state can't seek to hold the company accountable. 
Tik Tok said such claims should be brought by the users themselves, but a New York Supreme Court judge denied the request last May. 
A panel of appellet judges will hear Tik Tok's appeal later this afternoon. 
Confirmation Bias
5%
Anchoring Bias
11.3%
Availability Heuristic
25.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
13.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
29.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
14.2%
Negativity Bias
36.2%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
23.4%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
9.2%
Primacy Effect
36.9%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
57.4%
False Dilemma
14.2%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
14.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
13.5%
Appeal to Emotion
14.2%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
45.4%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
11.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

141 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.