NBC News⁠99%

Officer accidentally shoots colleague during 'horseplay' ⁠98%

6/12/2026, 3:53:12 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 83.9% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 818 faulty-reasoning hits from 205 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 96.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (548 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the video peer group.

ItĀ happensĀ inĀ aĀ flash,Ā aĀ momentĀ ofĀ carelessĀ levityĀ quicklyĀ takingĀ aĀ turn.Ā 
NewlyĀ releasedĀ dashcamĀ videoĀ showsĀ PasadenaĀ policeĀ jokingĀ aroundĀ duringĀ anĀ eveningĀ shiftĀ changeĀ inĀ SeptemberĀ whenĀ suddenlyĀ oneĀ pullsĀ hisĀ department-issuedĀ firearmĀ inĀ aĀ quickĀ draw,Ā appearingĀ toĀ aimĀ itĀ atĀ theĀ driver.Ā 
ThenĀ aĀ bang,Ā gunĀ smoke,Ā crackedĀ glass.Ā 
TheĀ driverĀ accidentallyĀ firesĀ throughĀ theĀ windshield,Ā woundingĀ aĀ colleague.Ā 
OfficerĀ down,Ā butĀ farĀ fromĀ theĀ lineĀ ofĀ duty.Ā 
>>Ā TheĀ shootingĀ resultedĀ fromĀ officersĀ engagedĀ inĀ unsafeĀ andĀ outĀ ofĀ policyĀ horseplayĀ involvingĀ loadedĀ firearms.Ā 
>>Ā InĀ aĀ videoĀ statement,Ā PasadenaĀ PoliceĀ ChiefĀ GeneĀ HarrisĀ saysĀ theĀ officerĀ wasĀ seriouslyĀ injuredĀ butĀ recoveredĀ andĀ thatĀ disciplinaryĀ measuresĀ wereĀ taken.Ā 
>>Ā HorseplayĀ and/orĀ failureĀ toĀ adhereĀ toĀ safetyĀ rulesĀ andĀ standardsĀ ofĀ professionalĀ conductĀ willĀ notĀ beĀ tolerated.Ā 
>>Ā AndĀ tonightĀ theĀ cityĀ tellingĀ NBCĀ NewsĀ theĀ officerĀ inĀ theĀ carĀ wasĀ relievedĀ ofĀ hisĀ positionĀ andĀ isĀ noĀ longerĀ withĀ theĀ department.Ā 
TheĀ policeĀ chiefĀ sayingĀ theĀ incidentĀ isĀ stillĀ underĀ criminalĀ investigation,Ā butĀ theĀ DistrictĀ Attorney'sĀ OfficeĀ tellingĀ NBCĀ NewsĀ theyĀ haveĀ yetĀ toĀ receiveĀ theĀ case.Ā 
Well,Ā theĀ policeĀ departmentĀ reckonsĀ withĀ anĀ embarrassingĀ momentĀ thatĀ defiesĀ policyĀ andĀ ignoresĀ safety.Ā 
Confirmation Bias
8.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
29.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
83.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
12.7%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
24.9%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
24.9%
Actor-Observer Bias
4.9%
In-Group Bias
7.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
8.8%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
11.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
32.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
66.3%
Begging the Question
8.8%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
13.2%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
12.7%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
16.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
2.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
23.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
2.9%
Biased Writer Voice
2.9%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

205 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.