NBC News99%

Trump calls on ABC, Disney to fire Jimmy Kimmel 100%

4/28/2026, 12:29:17 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.7% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 1,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 247 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (114 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the video peer group.

President Trump is calling on Disney and ABC to fire late night host Jimmy Kimmel for these comments during a parody of the White House correspondents dinner that aired last Thursday. 
>> And of course, our first lady, Melania, is here. Look at so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow. 
The segment aired two days before prosecutors say a gunman tried to assassinate the president who today slammed Kimmel for what he called a despicable call to violence, labeling the skit something far beyond the pale. 
The first lady today saying his monologue about my family isn't comedy. 
His words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America, adding enough is enough. 
Though Kimmel has not explained what he meant by the joke, the White House argues it was violent rhetoric. 
who in their right minds says a wife would be glowing over the potential murder of her beloved husband. 
>> The backlash comes seven months after ABC briefly suspended Jimmy Kim alive following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. 
>> With the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them. 
>> Days later, Kim will return. You understand that it was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man. 
ABC, its parent company Disney, and Kimble's publicist have not responded to requests for comment. 
Confirmation Bias
36.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
12.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
7.7%
Hindsight Bias
9.7%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
60.7%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
40.1%
Self-Serving Bias
9.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
15%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
13.8%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
8.9%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
8.5%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
8.9%
Straw Man
16.6%
Appeal to Authority
7.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
23.1%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
35.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
52.6%
Begging the Question
20.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
23.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
13.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
9.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
3.6%
Biased Writer Voice
12.6%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

247 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.