Fox News97%

Rep Mike Lawler rips Democratic Party's 'WEAK' leaders 69%

7/12/2026, 8:30:38 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Straw Man, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 138 faulty-reasoning hits from 794 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.6% and a BS Rank of 69% (4,514 of 14,490 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the video peer group.

Welcome back America. We have a friend 
of ours, Representative Mike Lawler from 
New York's 17th Congressional District, 
a man I have great respect for in a very 
difficult district. 
Uh Mike Lawler, uh you're close to the 
area and you've been watching this 
Mondani over the last 7 months or so. 
He's been a one-man wrecking ball 
to the entire metropolitan area that has 
an effect on the entire state there. 
Uh he seems to control the Democrat 
Party now. Schumer and Jeffries seem to 
have surrendered it to the Marxist 
Islamists. 
Um 
my concern here is that he's kind of 
leading a nationwide revolution. This 
seems to be 
now um 
the ground point from where they intend 
to spread this ideology, not the only 
one, don't get me wrong, but ground zero 
from where they intend to spread this 
ideology throughout the country. 
And the sickening irony is we're at the 
25th anniversary of 9/11 just in a in a 
few weeks. What do you make of all this? 
>> Well, you know, Mark, I said last year 
uh that Zohran Mamdani, if elected, 
would become the face of the Democratic 
Party, and he would be the most 
political mayor in the history of New 
York City, which is saying something 
when you think back to Tammany Hall and 
uh you know, uh LaGuardia and everything 
else that uh you know, has happened in 
New York. Uh the fact is 
uh that Zohran Mamdani uh is a Marxist. 
Uh and he fundamentally believes uh in 
this ideology. Uh I served with him in 
the state legislature. 
Uh we were friendly. We played poker uh 
every week up in Albany, and anytime he 
would win, I'd say, "All right, 
socialist, fork it over." Uh but the 
fact is that he believes in this stuff, 
and he is leading the charge along with 
AOC and Bernie Sanders, 
uh not just in New York, but across the 
country. And you're seeing it in these 
congressional seats, you're seeing it in 
these US Senate primaries, no matter how 
much they try to run away from Graham 
Platter now. 
The fact is they embraced 
his candidacy. They're embracing, you 
know, the the radical socialists in 
Michigan. They're embracing communists 
running in New York. 
And so this is where the Democratic 
Party is headed. And his speech on July 
4th, 
you know, basically condemning America. 
And you know, as as somebody who's an 
immigrant from Uganda who just became a 
US citizen eight years ago, he should be 
grateful for the opportunities that this 
country has afforded him and his family. 
Remember, he's a trust fund baby. 
His his mother has made a lot of money 
in Hollywood 
and in Bollywood. 
And you know, his father is a Marxist 
professor 
Columbia. I mean, this is this is the 
world view he grew up in and he is doing 
everything he can to enact it and remake 
the Democratic Party. 
And sadly, Schumer and Jeffries are 
weak, pathetic leaders 
that frankly are going to be gone. I 
mean, I 
Jeffries will be lucky if he 
remains the Democratic leader. 
I fundamentally do believe we will hold 
the house in November 
because this is a true choice for the 
American people between capitalism and 
Marxist 
socialist, communist. 
This is a choice between 
people who believe in the ideals and the 
values that built America and those who 
want to remake it. 
And I think the American people will 
soundly reject that in November. But 
Schumer is done. 
He is absolutely toast uh come 2028, 
uh whether it's AOC or some other 
radical socialist that takes him out uh 
in a Democratic primary, but mark my 
words, he he will be done uh come 2028. 
>> Now, what they've managed to do these 
Marxist Islamists is they've played the 
primary system. 
Uh they know that people really don't 
turn out in big numbers in most 
primaries, 
and so they get their vote out. In New 
York, I believe it was um 
in the the mosques turned out about 97% 
of their parishioners to vote in the 
Democrat primary, 
uh but overall was a relatively low 
turnout. And so, that's how you got a 
Mondami. They're doing this all over the 
country. They're doing it in places like 
Texas. They're doing it in New Jersey. 
They're doing it in California, even 
parts of Florida, other places like 
that. So, there's an entire strategy 
afoot here. So, that's my question to 
you when we return. We'll be right back. 
>> Hey everyone, I'm Emily Compagno. Catch 
me and my co-host Harris Faulkner and 
Kayleigh McEnany on Outnumbered every 
weekday at 12:00 p.m. Eastern, or set 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
4.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0.1%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
2.9%
Straw Man
1.4%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
1%
Slippery Slope
0.6%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
1.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
3.5%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
1%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

794 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers76%attributed speech187writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
9.3%flagged-word coverage
581 attributed words96% of attributed speech20% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.