KOLD3%

Suspect identified in downtown Tucson mass shooting 11%

7/21/2026, 12:52:56 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 146 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.1% and a BS Rank of 11% (16,986 of 18,913 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the article peer group.

TUCSON, Ariz. 
(KOLD) - Police have identified the suspect in a mass shooting that occurred in downtown Tucson on July 20, 2026. 
The suspect has been identified as 34-year-old Marcus Anthony Bell. 
Bell is facing multiple charges including first-degree murder and aggravated assault. 
The shooting took place around 10:00 PM on Saturday, July 20, 2026, in the 100 block of Congress Street. 
According to the Tucson Police Department, Bell opened fire on a crowd of people outside a popular downtown bar. 
Five people were killed and ten others were injured in the attack. 
Authorities say Bell fled the scene after the shooting but was apprehended by police a few hours later at his home. 
Investigators are still working to determine a motive for the attack. 
This is a developing story and will be updated as more information becomes available. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
6.8%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
4.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
7.5%
Negativity Bias
15.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
14.4%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
26.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
13%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
13.7%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

146 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.