How ICE turned its violent arrest of a US citizen into content  Stateside with Kai and Carter 46%

By Hosted by Carter Sherman0% Sam Levin0% produced by Tiara Chiaramonte0% Suzanne Gaber0% engineered by Ivan Kuraev0% executive producer Rachel Humphreys0%

5/15/2026, 8:50:10 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 85.7% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 385 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.9% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,166 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the article peer group.

In June 2025, Christian Cerna went to a protest in his neighborhood against ICE raids and allegedly punched a border patrol agent. 
He later pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault, but denies that he ever hit the officer. 
Days after the protest, Christian was violently arrested in front of his family by ICE officers, who filmed the whole operation and later posted it to social media. 
Christian tells Carter Sherman how the experience took a "heavy toll" on him and Sam Levin reveals the reporting behind the story 
Confirmation Bias
14.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
43.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
85.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
14.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
38.1%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
26.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
21%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
79%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
43.8%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

105 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.