Next City43%

Stories tagged ‘Urban Design’ 3%

8/2/2026, 7:26:34 AM

Topics: Urban Design
Keywords: Urban Design

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (24,624 of 25,181 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the article peer group.

What If We Designed Cities Like a Doctor? 
11 Podcasts for People Who Love Cities 
Anti-Racist Solutions: A Pecha Kucha Presentation 
LEARN-ing to Sustain a City’s Culture and Character 
How Affordable Housing Design Strengthens Social Resilience 
Teen Urban Designers Transform Chicago Public Spaces 
These Urban Planners Don’t Think New York City Needs New Jails 
What If Hip Hop Can Make Architecture and Planning Better? 
Detailed Maps Trace the Heat in Chicago Neighborhoods 
Architects Ask: Where Are the Spaces for Teen Girls? 
Planning for the Other Detroit 
Bicycle Urbanism by Design 
This NYC Park Is Designed to Be Flooded 
L.A. 
Names First Chief Design Officer 
These Winning Designs Rethink NYC Medians 
New Database Shames City Planners Into Ditching Hostile Design 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
14.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
7.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
5.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
4.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
7.3%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

123 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.