Thousands of cyclists pedal across Massachusetts for the Pan-Mass Challenge ⁠0%

By Sharon Brody⁠2% Paul Connearney⁠2%

8/2/2026, 3:36:49 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (30,571 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Organizers of the Pan-Mass Challenge held this weekend hoped to raise 79 million dollars for cancer research and care at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. 
Nearly 65-hundred cyclists took part. 
One of those riders was Rachel Marshall, who rode to honor her late father. 
During a brief stop in Wellfleet Sunday morning, Marshall joined WBUR's Weekend Edition as she got ready to make her way to the finish line in Provincetown. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 1.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 3.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 3.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 1.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 4.4%Cognoscenti: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 2.5%Cognoscenti: 1.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Brody: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

79 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.