Raw Story91%

Trump delivers first public post since troop deaths  with sanctions talk: 'Important!' 79%

By Alexander Willis88%

7/19/2026, 12:49:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.8% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 579 faulty-reasoning hits from 272 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.9% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,850 of 18,283 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump published his first post on Truth Social Sunday since the killing of at least two U.S. service members in Jordan, but rather than addressing the fallen soldiers, he issued a call for GOP lawmakers to amend a sanctions bill. 
“Republicans should add Iran to the Russian Sanctions Bill,” Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social. 
“That’s what Lindsey [Graham] wanted to do, and it was going to happen. 
IMPORTANT!!!” 
Trump’s statement comes amid a flare-up of violence in the Middle East, with the United States and Iran exchanging fire over the past week. 
On Friday, at least two U.S. service members were killed at the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan from Iranian strikes, which were launched in response to U.S. strikes targeting Iran’s southern coast. 
U.S. 
Central Command announced the deaths of the two U.S. service members on Saturday, also announcing that a third U.S. service member was missing. 
Notably, Trump had issued no formal public statement on the deaths, though he did respond to questions Saturday from NewsNation's Hannah Brandt, who reached him by phone, and called the soldiers' deaths "a very sad thing." 
The Atlantic columnist Tom Nichols expressed outrage at this wording  and demanded a detailed explanation from Trump. 
"Two more deaths are not, as Trump calls them, merely a 'very sad thing,'" Nichols wrote. 
"Before one more member of the U.S. military is killed, he should return to the airwaves—and stand before Congress—to explain what he’s doing in Iran and how many more lives he’s willing to risk." 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
8.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0.4%
Loss Aversion
12.5%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
5.9%
Negativity Bias
47.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
15.4%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0.4%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
4.8%
False Dilemma
5.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
18.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
12.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
12.5%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
13.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
6.6%
Quote-first Misdirection
5.9%
Biased Writer Voice
28.7%
Indoctrination
12.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

272 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.