Raw Story95%

Trump weighed national emergency to bypass election agency before firing leaders: report - Raw Story 60%

By https:49% www.facebook.com53% 2032425723488% Bennito L. Kelty89%

7/11/2026, 1:55:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Unattributed Quote, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 48.4% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 152 faulty-reasoning hits from 314 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (5,582 of 13,944 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the article peer group.

Marty Myers begins to put away the booths used for voting as Michigan polls close, in Kalamazzoo, Michigan, U.S., November 5, 2024. 
REUTERS/Carlos Osorio/File Photo 
The Trump administration plotted ways to bypass an election agency before firing its leaders, according to reporting by Reuters. 
According to four anonymous sources who spoke to Reuters, the White House "spent months" mulling ways around Election Assistance Commission guidelines for state voting machines. 
Earlier this week, Trump fired two Democratic members of the commission and allowed its lone Republican commissioner to resign just months before the midterms. 
Some Trump White House officials wanted the EAC to add a proof-of-citizenship requirement for the national mail voter registration form. 
Others, as far back as last fall, considered whether to declare a national emergency, according to Reuters. 
The idea of declaring a national emergency came from a recommendation by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 
The emergency declaration would be followed by the creation of a federal task force that would compel states to address vulnerabilities in their voting systems, sources told Reuters. 
Reuters noted that the report with those recommendations was never published, and the ODNI did not respond to a request for comment. 
However, two sources told Reuters that complaints about the commission continued since those recommendations came up last fall. 
Officials from the Department of Homeland Security, ODNI, and the White House also met with EAC leaders around the same time to discuss flaws in voting machines that they believed "could have contributed to abnormalities in 2020," sources told Reuters. 
According to Reuters, the Trump administration has not made it immediately clear why it ousted the last remaining heads of the EAC, but Reuters' sources say that the administration was "frustrated" with how slowly the commissioners were updating voting machine guidelines. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
48.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

314 words analyzed.

Voice attribution · Experimental

Who is speaking?

See where attributed voices appear and how each speaker's manipulation signature differs from the writer's voice.

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.