BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 569 faulty-reasoning hits from 637 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (16,256 of 21,187 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the article peer group.
This story appeared in Today, Explained, a daily newsletter that helps you understand the most compelling news and stories of the day.
Subscribe here.
During his campaign to become mayor of New York, Zohran Mamdani famously vowed that he’d arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the next time he visited the Big Apple.
This week, Netanyahu essentially called his bluff.
He’s expected to address the United Nations in September.
And after a whole lot of hemming, and hawing, and hedging, Mamdani admitted in a video Tuesday night that he does not actually have the legal authority to arrest a foreign dignitary on US soil.
The retreat is not surprising to legal experts, who had long questioned how Mamdani would pull this particular promise off.
In November 2024, the International Criminal Court — a tribunal recognized by 125 countries, not including Israel, China, Russia, or the US — did issue an arrest warrant for Netanyahu on charges of starvation, murder, persecution, and intentionally directing attacks against civilians.
But the US does not recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction.
And even if it did, the job of executing its warrants would presumably not fall to New York City cops.
So, why did Mamdani suggest he’d arrest Netanyahu when he actually knew he could not?
The end of the pro-Israel consensus
Mamdani’s allies argue that the principle here mattered, that the mayor needed to issue some kind of denunciation, even if he couldn’t act.
But there’s another, more cynical read here, too: For Democrats, critiquing Israel is good politics.
This is a seismic, generational shift, with far-ranging implications for both Democrats and US foreign policy.
The party’s left flank has criticized Israel for years, but older and more moderate Dems only soured on Israel recently.
“A few months after October 7, younger and progressive Democrats overwhelmingly took the opinion that Israel was committing a genocide,” said Hamid Bendaas, of the Institute for Middle East Understanding, a pro-Palestinian advocacy group.
“But there were still elements of the Democratic Party — people watching MSNBC or NPR — that weren’t convinced.”
For many of these voters, the turning point only came after President Donald Trump took office again.
Severe famine swept across Gaza last summer — the consequence of ongoing conflict and Israeli restrictions on food and aid shipments.
Netanyahu also allied himself closely with Trump, particularly around the war in Iran.
Support for Israel has consequently grown more GOP-coded, rather like Kid Rock or Bass Pro hats.
Now, even Democrats far to the right of Mamdani are looking to retool the US-Israeli relationship.
Listen to Tuesday’s Today, Explained podcast episode for even more about the shift (!).
One link for later
➨ Beat the endless scroll at its own game.
Social media is compelling — and compulsive — because it hijacks your sense of curiosity.
But my colleague Constance Grady has come up with a delightful (and delightfully simple) antidote: To reclaim your time, just find the thing that fascinates you even more than your feed.
Before you go…
* Did you know…that the term “luddite” comes from a movement of skilled, 19th-century textile workers who smashed and burned automated looms?
* Today’s trivia: The city of Enid, Oklahoma, is named after a character from which Victorian literary work?
(You can find this and other brain puzzles in Vox’s daily crossword.
Look for the answer in tomorrow’s edition.)
* Yesterday’s trivia: Yesterday I messed up!
I told you that there were 23 countries in Latin America, when there are in fact 23 countries in North America.
(I think we can all agree that the latter makes for more surprising trivia.)
I also asked you for the name of the Eminem song that gave us the slang term for an obsessive admirer.
That would be “Stan.”
It also samples Dido.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.