Townhall87%

Abigail Spanberger Gets Lit Up Over Her Energy Affordability Lies 91%

By Amy Curtis93%

7/14/2026, 8:30:59 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 63.8% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 363 faulty-reasoning hits from 207 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 85.7% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,535 of 15,664 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the article peer group.

Virginia's Democrat Governor Abigail Spanberger got into office on a promise of affordability, and her first act in office was to push for tax increases on everything from gym memberships to dog walking to energy bills. 
That's why Spanberger is getting absolutely lit up by her constituents for trying to brag about addressing the high energy costs that Democrat policies caused. 
"By using the power of the free market, leveraging the Commonwealth’s buying power, and cutting out middlemen, we are creating significant discounts for families and businesses," she wrote. 
It's not. 
And everyone knows it. 
Even Spanberger. 
Affordability! 
Yes, she is. 
So much affordability! 
Destroying the grid is the point. 
They don't want cheap, reliable energy. 
They want green nonsense that lowers our quality of life. 
She's panicking. 
Who doesn't have an extra $25,000 lying around? 
She also bragged about passing taxes on data centers, as if that'll make a difference. 
Stop making videos like this. 
She's doing great. 
All she does is lie. 
She looks in our faces and lies. 
Editor’s Note: Help us continue to report the truth about corrupt politicians. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
25.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
5.8%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
63.8%
Indoctrination
5.8%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
58%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
12.6%

207 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.