Elon Musk's 2-year-old 'warning' to iPhone maker about ChatGPT-maker resurfaces, as Apple accuses OpenAI of stealing trade secrets; Musk said: They are selling ... 23%

By TOI Tech Desk40%

7/11/2026, 6:07:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 11 faulty-reasoning hits from 414 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.3% and a BS Rank of 23% (10,830 of 13,944 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the article peer group.

A two-year-old warning from tech billionaire Elon Musk has resurfaced online following the news that Apple has officially sued its artificial intelligence (AI) partner, OpenAI, for trade secret theft. 
Apple filed a lawsuit on Friday, July 10, in the Northern District of California, accusing the ChatGPT creator of running a coordinated espionage campaign to systematically steal secret hardware designs, physical prototypes and supplier data. 
OpenAI has denied the allegations The lawsuit has bright spotlight back onto Musk’s historical warning about the fragile alliance between the two tech giants. 
Two years ago, when Apple first announced it would deeply integrate OpenAI's software features directly into its operating systems, Musk was critical of the arrangement. 
“It’s patently absurd that Apple isn’t smart enough to make their own AI, yet is somehow capable of ensuring that OpenAI will protect your security & privacy!” 
Musk warned at the time in a post, which has been reshared by Doge Designer, saying, “Elon Musk warned Apple about OpenAI two years ago.” 
“Apple has no clue what's actually going on once they hand your data over to OpenAI. 
They're selling you down the river,” the post, shared on June 11, 2024, said. 
Apple lawsuit: OpenAI ‘stole’ data 
The iPhone maker claims that OpenAI built up its rising consumer hardware division by targeting, poaching and extracting corporate secrets from Apple engineers. 
The lawsuit alleges that OpenAI went so far as to use its recruitment process to harvest trade secrets, encouraging job candidates to bring physical Apple prototypes and blueprints to their interviews, and using proprietary information to secretly approach Apple’s own manufacturing suppliers. 
The legal complaint explicitly names two major high-profile defections: Tang Tan who serves as the chief hardware officer at OpenAI and Chang Liu, a former iPhone hardware engineer who left the company to join OpenAI in January. 
OpenAI rejects Apple’s allegations 
Apple’s lawsuit formally charges the defendants with “trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract,” claiming that OpenAI's leadership actively normalized and encouraged the corporate misconduct. 
OpenAI has fired back. 
Drew Pusateri, OpenAI's Director of Strategic Communications, took to X to issue a swift, absolute denial of the theft. 
“We have no interest in other companies' trade secrets. 
We remain focused on building innovative technology that empowers people everywhere,” OpenAI said in the statement. 
Get the latest technology news and updates. 
Download the TOI App. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
2.7%

414 words analyzed.

Voice attribution · Experimental

Who is speaking?

See where attributed voices appear and how each speaker's manipulation signature differs from the writer's voice.

2speakers20%attributed speech332writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice

Elon Musk

0%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words70% of attributed speech3.3% writer coverage
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service-3.3 pts
Writer 3.3%Elon Musk 0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.