Mashable71%

FTC lawsuit: Hims & Hers shared customer data with Meta, Snap 25%

7/30/2026, 3:42:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 60.4% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 670 faulty-reasoning hits from 424 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,702 of 22,227 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the article peer group.

Major telehealth giant Hims & Hers is the latest target of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) crackdown on consumer data privacy, following a years-long investigation into whether or not the company was selling sensitive customer health data. 
In a new filing issued July 29 by the agency, joined by the states of Utah and California, the federal watchdog has formally accused the direct-to-consumer health company of sharing patient information with advertisers and tech giants like Meta and Snap. 
The FTC claims Hims & Hers provided the companies with lists of customer names, as well as information on their site behavior, despite pledging to protect customer data privacy. 
Such disclosures violate FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act, the FTC argues. 
Using ChatGPT Health? 
Read this first. 
The lawsuit also alleges the platform "deceives users about its billing and cancellation practices," including making it difficult to cancel subscriptions and mischaracterizing the process for prescription charges for new patients. 
Specifically, the FTC claims the company misleads users into believing they will not be charged for prescriptions before consulting with a physician. 
In practice, the lawsuit claims, many customers are asked to provide billing information and charged for prescription plans shortly after filling out intake forms, and without first reviewing the medications. 
In 2024, the FTC instituted new "Click to Cancel" rules mandating sellers utilize simple cancellation processes that allow customers to terminate charges in just one click. 
Many companies, primarily telecom giants , pushed back on Click to Cancel mandates, citing concerns that the agency was overextending its powers. 
The FTC was forced to vacate the ruling by a U.S. 
Appeals Court last year. 
Hims & Hers has faced scrutiny from lawmakers and major pharmaceutical companies. 
The platform faced threats of a lawsuit following what some alleged were misleading claims made in a 2025 Super Bowl ad criticizing the profit motivations of GLP-1 manufacturers. 
It has also been accused of running a gray market for weight loss medications using non-FDA approved manufacturing processes . 
The company itself has staked billions in the sale of weight loss products marketed as affordable, direct-to-consumer alternatives to mainstream GLP-1 medications. 
In a press release responding to the lawsuit, Hims & Hers argued the FTC was disregarding evidence unearthed during its investigation and ignoring existing state laws and industry standards to specifically target the San Francisco-based company. 
"This is not enforcement grounded in consumer protection; it is an effort to generate headlines at our expense," the company wrote. 
Confirmation Bias
9.7%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
9.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.2%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
19.3%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
5.2%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
60.4%
Self-Serving Bias
13.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
9.2%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
7.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
6.6%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
5.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
5%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0.7%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
1.4%

424 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.