Have 8 straight Wisconsin budgets given less money to public schools? 9%

By Zoey Elwood10%

8/5/2026, 3:06:53 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 226 faulty-reasoning hits from 169 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of 9% (27,012 of 29,618 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the article peer group.

No 
When adjusting for inflation and total student population, state K-12 funding has fluctuated over the past eight budgets and is about where it was before major cuts in 2011. 
Funding dropped after Republicans required public school employees to pay more toward pension and health insurance costs in 2011 under the law known as Act 10. 
Then from 2013 to 2020 inflation-adjusted, per-pupil spending on K-12 education increased each year. 
In the two years after the COVID-19 pandemic funding decreased but then increased over the next two years. 
Inflation-adjusted, per-pupil state spending is now slightly above what it was before the 2011 cuts. 
Here are the figures: 
2024-2025: $9,527.65 
2023-2024: $9,386.15 
2022-2023: $9,299.59 
2021-2022: $9,700.89 
2020-2021: $9,960.87 
2019-2020: $9,380.61 
2018-2019: $9,219.23 
2017-2018: $9,167.82 
2016-2017: $8,825.57 
2015-2016: $8,576.74 
2014-2015: $8,549.45 
2013-2014: $8,426.60 
2012-2013: $8,388.53 
2011-2012: $8,408.17 
2010-2011: $9,469.08 
Sources 
Wisconsin Watch School Funding w/Sept. 
Count 
Legislative Fiscal Bureau State Aid to School Districts 
Department of Public Instruction September count 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.1%Zoey Elwood: 0.4%Journal Sentinel: 1.2%Confirmation Bias7.1%This article: 1.2%Zoey Elwood: 1.3%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Anchoring Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.6%Journal Sentinel: 1.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 10.7%Zoey Elwood: 0.8%Journal Sentinel: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic10.7%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.2%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.5%Journal Sentinel: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Zoey Elwood: 3.9%Journal Sentinel: 2.8%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 26.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.5%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Status Quo Bias26.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.9%Journal Sentinel: 0.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Zoey Elwood: 0.5%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Pessimism Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 1.8%Journal Sentinel: 3.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.3%Journal Sentinel: 0.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 15.4%Zoey Elwood: 0.5%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error15.4%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.1%Journal Sentinel: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 1.6%Journal Sentinel: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.4%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.3%Zoey Elwood: 0.1%Journal Sentinel: 0.8%Recency Bias8.3%This article: 0.6%Zoey Elwood: 0.2%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.6%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.3%Journal Sentinel: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.2%Zoey Elwood: 3.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.8%Appeal to Authority11.2%This article: 6.5%Zoey Elwood: 0.9%Journal Sentinel: 1.1%False Dilemma6.5%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.2%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 1.0%Journal Sentinel: 2.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.6%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 1.6%Journal Sentinel: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.6%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.5%Begging the Question0.6%This article: 15.4%Zoey Elwood: 0.9%Journal Sentinel: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.4%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.2%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.3%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.1%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.6%Journal Sentinel: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 1.3%Journal Sentinel: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.9%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Middle Ground8.9%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.2%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.2%Journal Sentinel: 0.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.1%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.5%Zoey Elwood: 0.4%Journal Sentinel: 0.5%Biased Writer Voice6.5%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.1%Journal Sentinel: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.4%Journal Sentinel: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.4%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zoey Elwood: 0.5%Journal Sentinel: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

169 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.