Is Mayor Wilson turning off police cameras? Sort of 65%

By Scott Greenstone0%

3/20/2026, 4:15:03 PM

Topics: Politics
Keywords: Politics

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Red Herring, and Middle Ground, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 399 faulty-reasoning hits from 546 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.2% and a BS Rank of 65% (6,044 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the article peer group.

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson made a slightly confusing announcement on Thursday: She’s pausing the expansion of scores of police surveillance cameras around the city, except in the Stadium District, where 26 will go in ahead of the World Cup. 
Those new cameras won’t be turned on  except when there’s a “credible threat.” 
It’s Wilson’s effort to find a middle ground between businesses and community members who want the cameras to help catch criminals and some of her most active and dedicated supporters who are worried the federal government can access the cameras’ data. 
“Sometimes as the mayor you make decisions that no one's going to like. 
This might be one of those,” Wilson said. 
“Some people will be upset that I'm not turning off all the cameras immediately, and others will be upset that I'm not charging ahead with turning on more.” 
Wilson also ordered hundreds of license plate readers on Seattle cop cars be turned off. 
They'll remain off, just like the new surveillance cameras, until an audit can figure out how many eyes outside the local government can peek through all those lenses. 
Wilson isn't the only lawmaker in Washington trying to figure out how to respond to fears that Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies could peer through local police surveillance cameras. 
The City of Seattle and the state Legislature are trying to limit federal access to license plate readers and other surveillance technology, while cities like Everett or Redmond have turned them off after reports last year found federal agencies had accessed their data. 
Some of Wilson’s most dedicated supporters believe shutting the cameras off indefinitely is the only way to keep the federal government out. 
“The problem is that the records exist,” said Xochitl Maykovich, who was Wilson’s field director during her general election campaign last year. 
“The only way you can not get something is if it doesn't exist, which is why a lot of our government agencies do not collect immigration status." 
Maykovich and more than 1,200 other people who say they knocked doors for Wilson have signed a letter asking the new mayor to immediately halt the cameras’ expansion. 
Some activists are going further. 
A few hours before Wilson’s announcement, a handful interrupted Gov. 
Bob Ferguson as he signed a bill making it a gross misdemeanor to impersonate an ICE agent. 
“All cameras are hackable. 
All surveillance is subpoenable,” a protester holding a sign shouted, running in front of the governor’s podium. 
After the activists were forced out by police, they chanted outside, shouted into megaphones, and pounded on the windows. 
Ferguson told reporters later he understands the protesters’ frustrations, but it's not easy to figure out how to filter through the massive amounts of data the state shares with the federal government as part of investigations into crimes like human trafficking. 
“If we give information to a certain legitimate agency, even though they will sign documents saying, ‘We're not going to share with anybody else,’ they still do it anyway,” Ferguson said. 
“I've still got to be thoughtful about that information, and sometimes it's pretty clear we can cut this off and there's no harm in Washington state to it. 
Other times... it's more nuanced.” 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
1.3%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
5.7%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
3.8%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
10.1%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
3.8%
Red Herring
7.5%
Bandwagon
5.1%
Appeal to Emotion
5.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
2.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
7.5%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
12.3%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
7.5%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

546 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.