Daily Kos88%

‘Some tough breaks’: Trump toadie goes soft on economic spin 90%

By Walter Einenkel100%

7/31/2026, 12:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 74.5% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 585 faulty-reasoning hits from 145 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 79.3% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,668 of 25,564 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.60% of the article peer group.

National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett appeared on Fox Business Friday to try to spin the woeful 1.5% GDP growth last quarter, rising inflation, and surging farm bankruptcies. 
“I think that America’s farmers have had some tough breaks,” Hassett said. 
“A bumper crop in Brazil made it so prices went down globally, the disruptions in the Gulf have made fertilizer prices go up, and it’s really, really important that we help farmers—we get them the relief they need at this difficult time.” 
“Disruptions in the Gulf” is certainly one way to refer to President Donald Trump’s disastrous Iran war. 
Hassett also left out one of the biggest drivers of increased costs for Americans: Trump’s tariffs. 
As Trump’s approval rating shows, Hassett can omit any fact he likes. 
The American people still know who’s to blame. 
Confirmation Bias
40%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
5.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
8.3%
Hindsight Bias
11.7%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
74.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
57.2%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
11.7%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
5.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
15.2%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.3%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
5.5%
Red Herring
29%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
19.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
11%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
29%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
8.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
46.2%
Indoctrination
5.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

145 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.