State Board of Education Approves New Biblical Curriculum 26%

By Jessica Montoya Coggins43%

6/30/2026, 7:12:02 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 321 faulty-reasoning hits from 292 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.8% and a BS Rank of 26% (22,623 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the article peer group.

On June 26, the Texas State Board of Education voted to approve massive changes to social studies curriculum for public school students. 
The changes, which will take effect starting in 2030, include adding certain Bible stories into required reading lists. 
The new changes will also dramatically impact subjects like history, government, and economics. 
A sixth-grade course about world history will be eliminated. 
United States and Texas history will receive more of a focus. 
The changing school curriculum passed in the state board on a 9-4 party-line vote, with two members not present. 
There are 15 State Board of Education members who are elected either to two- or four-year terms. 
Currently, there are 15 Republican members. 
Eight seats on the board will be up for re-election in November. 
Ahead of the vote last week, hundreds of Texans testified both for and against the new curriculum. 
State Rep. 
Salman Bhojani urged the SBOE to pause the whole process and noted that the new reading lists fail to represent the diverse student body of Texas. 
Bhojani was also one of 46 Texas Democratic State and Senate members who signed a letter to the SBOE expressing concern for the social studies overhaul. 
The members alleged that several content advisors working on the new curriculum have financial conflicts of interest as they are also affiliated with a conservative think tank. 
On his Twitter page, Governor Abbott posted a local story about the new social studies curriculum including Bible stories. 
The Houston Chronicle has a full list of the required reading, including the proposed new Bible stories. 
The stories start with Jonah and the whale in first grade and go up to the first book of Corinthians in senior year. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.2%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 3.3%TexaSignal: 2.5%Confirmation Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.3%TexaSignal: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 3.9%TexaSignal: 2.4%Availability Heuristic11.6%This article: 2.1%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 1.2%TexaSignal: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.1%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.7%TexaSignal: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 5.5%TexaSignal: 4.6%Framing Effect7.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.2%TexaSignal: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.6%TexaSignal: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.3%TexaSignal: 0.3%Pessimism Bias4.5%This article: 15.8%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 6.4%TexaSignal: 5.2%Negativity Bias15.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.6%TexaSignal: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 1.1%TexaSignal: 0.6%In-Group Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.7%TexaSignal: 0.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 1.3%TexaSignal: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.3%TexaSignal: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 1.0%TexaSignal: 0.9%Ad Hominem9.2%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 2.8%TexaSignal: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.7%TexaSignal: 0.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 2.2%TexaSignal: 3.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 8.9%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 1.9%TexaSignal: 0.6%Bandwagon8.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 5.8%TexaSignal: 3.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.4%TexaSignal: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 1.3%TexaSignal: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.9%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.7%TexaSignal: 0.4%Burden of Proof8.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 3.3%TexaSignal: 1.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.7%TexaSignal: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.4%TexaSignal: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 1.3%TexaSignal: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 8.9%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.8%TexaSignal: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection8.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 1.8%TexaSignal: 3.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 14.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 2.0%TexaSignal: 1.0%Indoctrination14.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.2%TexaSignal: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.0%TexaSignal: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Montoya Coggins: 0.2%TexaSignal: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

292 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech247writer words
Selected voice

Salman Bhojani

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words58% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Salman Bhojani: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-16.6 ptsWriter: 16.6%Salman Bhojani: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.