Gizmodo57%
Space Force Has a New Weapon to Blind Enemy Satellites6%
By Passant Rabie0%
7/10/2026, 6:50:17 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 553 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.9% and a BS Rank of 6% (13,280 of 14,081 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the article peer group.
Space Force Has a New Weapon to Blind Enemy Satellites
The electromagnetic warfare system is designed to jam signals of adversary spacecraft.
Published July 10, 2026, 2:50 pm ET
Reading time 2 minutes
Meadowlands uses ground-based radio frequency units to disrupt satellite communications. L3Harris
The Space Force added a new weapon to its arsenal, a device designed to blast electromagnetic beams to silence adversary satellites in space.
The Meadowlands Counter Communications System, developed by L3Harris Technologies, was added to the military branch’s fleet of electromagnetic warfare systems on June 8, the Space Force recently announced . The device is able to “detect, deny, disrupt, and degrade adversary capabilities in active defense of joint force objectives,” to create a so-called silence zone, according to the Space Force.
The recent acquisition highlights the U.S. military’s focus on space-based warfare, heavily investing in the Space Force’s capabilities to be able to counter enemies in orbit.
Meadowlands is an antenna dish mounted on top of a wheeled trailer and is designed to be loaded on board a large transporter aircraft. It’s an upgraded, more compact version of the Space Force’s Counter Communications System (CCS) Block 10.2, a deployable, ground-based system designed to cut off communications from satellites.
The new anti-satellite system beams electromagnetic radiation, targeting adversary spacecraft by blasting their uplink and downlink signals to essentially silence them. Meadowlands’ counter-signal is designed to be aimed directly at an adversarial satellite’s receiving antenna. As a result, the targeted satellite would not be able to receive commands or process critical telemetry, which would interfere with its basic functions and disrupt its hardware and software operations.
Other anti-satellite weapons are designed to inflict physical damage on their target, using kinetic impact to collide with a satellite in space. This creates massive clouds of debris and adds to the already growing problem of space junk. In 2022, the U.S. adopted a self-imposed ban on anti-satellite tests, encouraging other nations to do the same.
The Space Force’s new system creates “reversible” effects, interfering with a satellite’s software without creating a cloud of debris.
In its statement, the Space Force referenced Operation Midnight Hammer, in which the U.S. military attacked three nuclear facilities in Iran on June 22, 2025. According to the Space Force, electromagnetic warfare systems, like Meadowlands, were used to create a silence zone to halt enemy communications in the joint force operation.
“Our Guardians are at the forefront of joint operations, so we are fielding capability that best enables their success and the success of the joint force,” U.S. Space Force Col. Angelo Fernandez, commander of Mission Delta 3 – Space Electromagnetic Warfare, said in a statement. “We’re continuously pursuing capability modifications to modernize our fleet and better enable our Guardians as they execute missions on behalf of the combatant command and in support of U.S. objectives.”
As satellite communication systems become a vital part of the modern battlefield, so will anti-satellite weapons. Just last month, the Space Force executed a simulated orbital threat scenario , launching a satellite on short notice to intercept another as a response to urgent threats in space.
Explore more on these topics
Sign up for our newsletters
Subscribe and interact with our community, get up to date with our customised Newsletters and much more.
Who is speaking?
See where attributed voices appear and how each speaker's manipulation signature differs from the writer's voice.
Angelo Fernandez
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.