What Do Nate Blouin’s Old Social Media Posts Mean for State Democrats? 87%

4/21/2026, 4:18:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 323 faulty-reasoning hits from 160 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 80.6% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,215 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the article peer group.

In the posts, Blouin ridiculed the LDS faith, mocked domestic violence, and threatened physical assault. 
He has since apologized, but the fallout comes as a recent campaign poll shows him running second in the Salt Lake County race, behind centrist candidate and former U.S. 
Representative Ben McAdams. 
The moment now tests whether Blouin can retain his status as a leading voice among the state’s progressive Democrats. 
Political reporters Sean Higgins and Robert Gehrke are among our guests to discuss the consequences of Blouin’s crude online posts and the ideological tensions within the Utah Democratic Party. 
GUESTS 
Robert Gehrke is a politics and government reporter for the Salt Lake Tribune. 
Sean Higgins is a KUER politics reporter and co-host of the podcast “State Street.” 
Gabi Finlayson is a senior partner at Elevate Strategies, a Democratic political consulting firm. 
Mitchell Vice is the chair of the Utah State Progressive Caucus. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
20.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
11.9%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
27.5%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
18.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
18.1%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
26.9%
False Dilemma
11.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
9.4%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
9.4%
Biased Writer Voice
36.3%
Indoctrination
11.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

160 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.