ICE Wants to Transform an SLC Warehouse into a Immigration Jailhouse 95%

3/31/2026, 9:55:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 93.6% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 822 faulty-reasoning hits from 202 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.8% and a BS Rank of 95% (836 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the article peer group.

U.S. 
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement recently purchased a warehouse on Salt Lake City’s west side, but the agency doesn’t intend to use the site for goods or merchandise: It will be a detention facility, part of the agency’s efforts to round up and deport a million people every year. 
U.S. 
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement recently purchased a warehouse on Salt Lake City’s west side, but the agency doesn’t intend to use the site for goods or merchandise: It will be a detention facility, part of the agency’s efforts to round up and deport a million people every year.ICE failed to inform any local lawmakers prior to buying the warehouse. 
They didn’t even notify the state’s all-GOP congressional delegation of their plans. 
Agency leadership has since told Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall that the warehouse will serve to jail between 7,500 and 10,000 people, and the mayor has vowed to do everything within her power to stop it. 
There are a lot of questions swirling around the facility, and journalists Jose Davila IV and Nick Miroff join us to share what they’ve learned about ICE’s effort to reengineer warehouses into jailhouses. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
40.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
21.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
93.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
5.9%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
29.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
18.3%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
5.9%
Red Herring
16.3%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
42.1%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
29.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
29.2%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
69.3%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
5.9%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

202 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.