BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 199 faulty-reasoning hits from 149 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,583 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the article peer group.

It’s the turn of the 20th century, and a number of astronomers are convinced they’ve uncovered proof of life on Mars. 
Among them is Percival Lowell, who believed Mars was home to an ancient people. 
There’s also Camille Flammarion, a public intellectual who believed we could communicate with extraterrestrials by flashing signs from earth. 
Tons of characters abound, including Nikola Tesla. 
The press got caught up in the mania too, with a 1906 New York Times headline proclaiming, “There is life on the planet Mars.” 
If any of that reminds you of our present-day fascination  say, Elon Musk’s quest to colonize Mars  then you’re in for a treat. 
GUEST 
David Baron is an author, journalist, and public speaker. 
His latest book is The Martians: The True Story of an Alien Craze that Captured Turn-of-the-Century America. 
Airdate: Mar. 
25, 2026 (Rebroadcast) 
Confirmation Bias
14.1%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
16.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
20.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
16.1%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
20.8%
Indoctrination
16.8%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
28.2%

149 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.