McKay Coppins' Year as a Degenerate Gambler 51%

3/17/2026, 1:23:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 129 faulty-reasoning hits from 175 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.5% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,338 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the article peer group.

The journalist McKay Coppins wasn’t a gambling man. 
But when his employer The Atlantic staked him $10,000 to bet on the 2025 NFL season, he couldn’t say no. 
Step one was getting permission from his bishop. 
Coppins is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which prohibits gambling. 
But since it wasn’t his money and it was for work, he got the go-ahead. 
And so began what Coppins calls his year as a degenerate gambler  because it wasn’t long before he started feeling, well, kind of addicted. 
He’s joining us to talk about sports betting, how it changed him, and how it came to be that last year alone Americans bet $160 billion on touchdowns scored, yards gained, buckets made and pretty much any other outcome you could imagine in sports. 
GUEST  
McKay Coppins | Staff writer at The Atlantic and co-host of the podcast Deseret Voices. 
His story is called “Sucker: My Year as a Degenerate Gambler.” 
Airdate: Mar. 
18, 2026 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.