You Won't Find Every Word in the Dictionary. Here's Why.95%

3/16/2026, 6:28:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.6% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 372 faulty-reasoning hits from 126 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.8% and a BS Rank of 95% (844 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the article peer group.

Two decades ago, there were roughly 200 commercial lexicographers in the United States. 
Today, fewer than 50 remain. 
Stefan Fatisis’s new book, “Unabridged,” chronicles his time embedded at Merriam-Webster, defining nearly 90 words  only 14 of which made it into the dictionary. 
It’s hard getting a word into the dictionary, even if it’s been in use for a while. 
Take “microaggression,” for example. 
It’s been in consideration since 1974, and thanks to Fatsis, now appears in the new edition. 
Stefan Fatsis joins us to talk about how words make it into the dictionary, how they’re defined, and how they change culture. 
Stefan Fatsis is a journalist and the author of four books. 
His latest is Unabridged: The Thrill of (and Threat to) the Modern Dictionary. 
Confirmation Bias
31%
Anchoring Bias
10.3%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
34.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
27.8%
Negativity Bias
47.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
38.9%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
12.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
38.9%
False Dilemma
10.3%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
10.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
12.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
16.7%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

126 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.