BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 416 faulty-reasoning hits from 225 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 73.2% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,321 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the article peer group.

LDS President Dallin H. Oaks (left) with newly appointed apostle Clark G. Gilbert 
LDS President Dallin H. Oaks has chosen a new apostle. 
His name is Clark G. Gilbert, and his appointment is raising controversy among the faithful. 
Scholar Benjamin Park joins us to explain why. 
Clark has a reputation as an orthodox, religious conservative. 
As the Church’s commissioner of education, he oversees Brigham Young University. 
There, faculty have raised concerns about a “loyalty oath” that affirms Church doctrine and enforces strict behavioral standards, especially concerning women and LGBTQ+ issues. 
Before that, Gilbert spent time at the Church-owned Deseret News, where he laid off dozens of employees. 
Now, he’s a lifetime member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. 
That puts him in a position of significant power within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 
We’ll talk about what it means. 
GUESTS  
Benjamin E. Park | He’s an associate professor of history at Sam Houston State University, author of the book “American Zion: A New History of Mormonism,” and president of the Mormon History Association. 
You can check out his YouTube page here. 
Peggy Fletcher Stack | She’s a senior religion reporter for The Salt Lake Tribune. 
Her article, “Dark Days: New Rules Have BYU Professors Running Scared,” was published on January 6th, 2025. 
Airdate: Feb. 19, 2026, and Feb. 21, 2026 
Confirmation Bias
25.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
4%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
36.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
32.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
7.6%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
5.8%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
7.6%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
24.4%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
32.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
7.6%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

225 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.