The Tragic Tale of the Edmund Fitzgerald94%

2/3/2026, 6:14:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 78% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 671 faulty-reasoning hits from 201 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 90.6% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,058 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the article peer group.

As big freighters go, the Edmund Fitzgerald was the biggest, the best and the most profitable ship on the Great Lakes. 
Then, on Nov. 10, 1975, facing gale-force winds and 50-foot waves, the ship sank, taking all 29 men aboard her down into the icy depths of Lake Superior. 
The SS Edmund Fitzgerald, in 1971 
Though its sinking was tragic, the Mighty Fitz was just one of thousands of shipwrecks on the Great Lakes. 
And the reason we all know that one? 
Of course, it’s the Gordon Lightfoot song. 
As the author John U. Bacon admits, were it not for Lightfoot’s stirring ballad, he likely wouldn’t have written his latest book  a definitive account of the wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald. 
Yes, Bacon says, the gales of November did come early that year. 
Yes, the ship’s captain and her crew were well seasoned, and their passing was heartbreaking for those left behind, “the wives, and the sons and the daughters.” 
Bacon joins us to explore the fascinating story of this memorable maritime disaster. 
John U. Bacon is the author of more than a dozen books. 
His latest is The Gales of November: The Untold Story of the Edmund Fitzgerald. 
Confirmation Bias
39.5%
Anchoring Bias
9.5%
Availability Heuristic
24%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
47.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
27.5%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
16.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
28.5%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
13.5%
Begging the Question
4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
3.5%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
13.5%
Biased Writer Voice
78%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
30%

200 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.