The Making of Handel’s Messiah73%

12/23/2025, 5:05:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 175 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,668 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the article peer group.

In 2021, protestors stormed the U.S. Capitol and tried to overturn the presidential election. 
In that moment, author Charles King turned to Handel’s Messiah. 
He found solace in the famous 18th century oratorio, which tells the story of Christ’s birth and resurrection. 
Maybe that’s because the piece was written in similarly tumultuous times. 
Yes, the Enlightenment was underway, but it was also an age of empire and enslavement. 
The first words sung in Messiah, spoken by God, are “Comfort ye, my people.” 
That was the reassurance Charles King needed in 2021. 
His book is about the creation of Handel’s Messiah and the troubled days for which it was composed. 
GUEST  
Charles King | Professor of International Affairs and Government at Georgetown University. 
His latest book is called “Every Valley: The Desperate Lives and Troubled Times that Made Handel’s Messiah” [Amazon | Bookshop]. 
Airdate: Thurs., Dec. 19, 2024 at 9 a.m. and Sat., Dec. 21, 2024 at 11 a.m. 
Rebroadcast: Thurs., Dec. 24, 2025 at 9 a.m. and Sat., Dec. 26, 2025 at 11 a.m. 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
6.3%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
11.4%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
30.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Hindsight Bias
5.1%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
8.6%
Optimism Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
6.3%
Anecdotal
5.1%
Appeal to Authority
14.9%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11.4%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

175 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.