Scammers impersonate FBI on social media, prey on crime victims 65%

By Brandon Vigliarolo41%

7/20/2026, 8:10:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 237 hits. Analysis detected 1,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 525 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (6,621 of 18,900 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the article peer group.

Real FBI agents won't slide into your DMs and offer to help you recover stolen funds. 
The bureau's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) updated an earlier warning on Monday about scammers impersonating the agency online, saying fraudsters continue to use the scheme "to deceive and revictimize individuals." 
According to IC3, there are two different schemes being used to target cybercrime victims, both directly and by soliciting them to report incidents. 
In the first scheme, IC3 said scammers create fraudulent social media profiles and pages impersonating FBI personnel or IC3. 
They may also infiltrate online groups for fraud victims or contact victims directly while claiming to represent the FBI or the complaint center. 
In other cases, victims are being contacted by someone claiming to be an FBI agent after realizing they were approached by someone trying to scam them and saying they intended to report the incident to the FBI or file an IC3 complaint. 
The FBI said the impersonator then directs victims to a fake IC3 website or continues communicating through messaging apps. 
In the other instance, scammers are creating AI-generated videos on social media depicting senior FBI officials and directing users to a spoofed IC3 website to report cybercrimes they may have fallen victim to, with the scammers then collecting the information and using it to contact victims for further fraud. 
AI-generated depictions of public figures are similarly being used to make such scams appear legitimate. 
“Some individuals received an email or a phone call, while others were approached, or observed an advertisement via social media or forums,” the IC3 said. 
“Almost all complainants indicated the scammers claimed to have recovered the victim's lost funds or offered to assist in recovering funds.” 
Regardless of how legitimate social media profiles look, or how realistic those AI-generated videos may be, the IC3 is warning that none of them should be believed for a simple reason: The IC3 doesn’t have a social media presence of any kind, and it doesn’t investigate crimes or offer to recover lost funds through social media. 
“Any social media profiles or pages claiming to represent IC3 or offering to recover lost money are fraudulent and are actively attempting to steal your personal or financial information,” the IC3 warned. 
“IC3 will never directly communicate with individuals via phone, email, social media, phone apps, online chat, or public forums.” 
MORE CONTEXT 
Attackers pummel critical WordPress vuln to create all sorts of mischief 
US cybercrime losses pass $20B for first time as AI boosts online fraud 
Ignore that FBI. 
We're the real FBI, says the FBI that's totally the FBI 
Extortion crews are visiting law firms pretending to be tech support, FBI warns 
The IC3 said that any contact made with a cybercrime victim who reports an incident via its actual website will be made by an FBI employee from a local field office or other law enforcement official. 
Here’s another hot tip: If you fall victim to a cybercrime or online scam, don’t post about it on social media - that’s only going to invite someone with bad intentions to seek you out. 
® 
Confirmation Bias
7.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
13.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.9%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
25.5%
Loss Aversion
6.7%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
45.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
5.9%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
19.6%
False Dilemma
4.4%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
2.1%
Hasty Generalization
16.8%
Red Herring
0.6%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
10.7%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
2.5%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
3%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
3.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
10.7%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
1.9%
Indoctrination
27.6%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

525 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.